Battle of Ideas
On Thursday night I am speaking at the Battle of Ideas on the topic In Defence of Subjects. If you are a regular reader of this blog, you will know that I will of course be defending subjects. I am planning to speak about my experiences of teaching subjects and their alternatives, and the pragmatic reasons why subjects are superior.
One of the main reasons against subject-based education is that traditional subjects are outdated, fail to take into account advances in technology and are and not fit for purpose in the 21st century. I’ve criticised the idea of ’21st century skills’ here and the idea that technology will replace memory here.
Another prominent reason against subject-based education is that it is elitist. I hope to deal with this issue in a blog post shortly.
I am speaking on a panel with three other people: Alka Sehgal Cuthbert, Tim Oates and Martin Johnson.
I’ll post a summary of the debate with further thoughts on Friday.
- What is Mastery? The good, the bad, the ugly May 7, 2019
- What the marathon teaches you about education April 27, 2019
- English Mastery: Writing an evidence-based curriculum April 18, 2019
- My top 10 education books of 2018 December 15, 2018
- Global Education and Skills Forum 2018 March 20, 2018
- Research Ed 2017 September 10, 2017
- Feedback and English mocks August 16, 2017
- Workload and English mocks July 22, 2017
- Life after Levels: Five years on June 11, 2017
- Five ways you can make the primary writing moderation process less stressful June 4, 2017